Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Dace

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Dace

423 S.W.3d 285, 2014 WL 114149, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 24

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 14, 2014·No. No. WD 76566·Published

Opinion

[286] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Emanuel Dace appeals pro se from the Circuit Court of Jackson County’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-CPI Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-CPI. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the trial court properly entered summary judgment, as there is no genuine issue of material fact, and Respondent was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[286] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Emanuel Dace appeals pro se from the Circuit Court of Jackson County’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-CPI Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-CPI. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the trial court properly entered summary judgment, as there is no genuine issue of material fact, and Respondent was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Dace, 423 S.W.3d 285, 2014 WL 114149, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 24 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

423 S.W.3d 285 (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Dace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.