Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cisse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cisse

2017 NY Slip Op 8894, 156 A.D.3d 545, 65 N.Y.S.3d 689

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 2017

Docket5268N 382162/09

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 8894 (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cisse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cisse, 2017 NY Slip Op 8894, 156 A.D.3d 545, 65 N.Y.S.3d 689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered November 13, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff’s motion for an order of reference and a default judgment against defendant Cisse, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It is unnecessary to consider whether defendant demonstrated a meritorious defense to this foreclosure action, because he failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse, or indeed any excuse, for his failure to answer the complaint or otherwise timely appear in this action, which was commenced in 2009 (see Mutual Mar. Off., Inc. v Joy Constr. Corp., 39 AD3d 417, 419 [1st Dept 2007]; see also Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Mazzara, 124 AD3d 875 [2d Dept 2015]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, Kahn and Kern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered November 13, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff’s motion for an order of reference and a default judgment against defendant Cisse, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It is unnecessary to consider whether defendant demonstrated a meritorious defense to this foreclosure action, because he failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse, or indeed any excuse, for his failure to answer the complaint or otherwise timely appear in this action, which was commenced in 2009 (see Mutual Mar. Off., Inc. v Joy Constr. Corp., 39 AD3d 417, 419 [1st Dept 2007]; see also Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Mazzara, 124 AD3d 875 [2d Dept 2015]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, Kahn and Kern, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 8894, 156 A.D.3d 545, 65 N.Y.S.3d 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-fargo-bank-na-v-cisse-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack