Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cisse

2017 NY Slip Op 8894, 156 A.D.3d 545, 65 N.Y.S.3d 689
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 2017·No. 5268N 382162/09·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered November 13, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff’s motion for an order of reference and a default judgment against defendant Cisse, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It is unnecessary to consider whether defendant demonstrated a meritorious defense to this foreclosure action, because he failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse, or indeed any excuse, for his failure to answer the complaint or otherwise timely appear in this action, which was commenced in 2009 (see Mutual Mar. Off., Inc. v Joy Constr. Corp., 39 AD3d 417, 419 [1st Dept 2007]; see also Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Mazzara, 124 AD3d 875 [2d Dept 2015]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, Kahn and Kern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cisse, 2017 NY Slip Op 8894, 156 A.D.3d 545, 65 N.Y.S.3d 689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 8894 (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cisse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dong v. Howe
2023 NY Slip Op 04716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)