Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Braun

123 A.D.3d 698, 998 N.Y.S.2d 420
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 3, 2014
Docket2013-01724
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 123 A.D.3d 698 (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Braun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Braun, 123 A.D.3d 698, 998 N.Y.S.2d 420 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Moshe Braun and Yehudas Braun appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Garvey, J.), dated August 22, 2012, which, inter alia, denied that branch of their motion which was pursuant to CELR 5015 (a) (3) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court entered July 30, 2008, upon their failure to appear or answer the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the motion of the defendants Moshe Braun and Yehudas Braun (hereinafter together the defendants) which was to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale pursuant to CELR 5015 (a) (3). Under the circumstances of this case, the defendants failed to move for relief pursuant to CELR 5015 (a) (3) within a reasonable time after entry of the judgment (see Indymac Bank, F.S.B. v Yano-Horoski, 107 AD3d 672 [2013]; Bank of N.Y. v Stradford, 55 AD3d 765, 765 [2008]). In any event, the defendants failed to *699 provide a reasonable excuse for the default, which is required when a CPLR 5015 (a) (3) motion alleges intrinsic fraud, i.e., that the allegations in the complaint are false (see New Century Mtge. Corp. v Corriette, 117 AD3d 1011, 1012 [2014]; Bank of N.Y. v Stradford, 55 AD3d at 765-766; Bank of N.Y. v Lagakos, 27 AD3d 678, 679 [2006]).

In light of our determination, we need not address the parties’ remaining contentions.

Balkin, J.P., Hall, Austin and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PennyMac Corp. v. Weiss
2017 NY Slip Op 5746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Fishkin, Pugach & Finkelstein, P.C. v. Biggio
128 A.D.3d 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 A.D.3d 698, 998 N.Y.S.2d 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-fargo-bank-na-v-braun-nyappdiv-2014.