Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Banks

2020 NY Slip Op 3687, 185 A.D.3d 626, 124 N.Y.S.3d 814
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 1, 2020
DocketIndex No. 705057/14
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 3687 (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Banks, 2020 NY Slip Op 3687, 185 A.D.3d 626, 124 N.Y.S.3d 814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Banks (2020 NY Slip Op 03687)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Banks
2020 NY Slip Op 03687
Decided on July 1, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 1, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2019-04226
(Index No. 705057/14)

[*1]Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., respondent,

v

Tyra Banks, etc., et al., appellants, et al., defendants.


John C. Schnaufer, Esq., LLC, Hartsdale, NY, for appellants.

Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP (Reed Smith LLP, New York, NY [Andrew B. Messite and Joseph S. Jacobs], of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Tyra Banks and Michael Banks appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Janice A. Taylor, J.), entered February 6, 2019. The order granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against those defendants, to strike those defendants' amended answer, and to appoint a referee to compute the amount due to the plaintiff.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We affirm the order for reasons stated in Vanderbilt Mtge. & Fin., Inc. v Ammon (179 AD3d 1138, 1141) and Citimortgage, Inc. v Simon (137 AD3d 1190, 1192-1193).

RIVERA, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, DUFFY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citimortgage, Inc. v. Simon
137 A.D.3d 1190 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 3687, 185 A.D.3d 626, 124 N.Y.S.3d 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-fargo-bank-na-v-banks-nyappdiv-2020.