Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 24 W. 57 APF LLC

2024 NY Slip Op 30483(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedFebruary 13, 2024
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 30483(U) (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 24 W. 57 APF LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 24 W. 57 APF LLC, 2024 NY Slip Op 30483(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v 24 W. 57 APF LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 30483(U) February 13, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 850014/2024 Judge: Francis A. Kahn III Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 850014/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/13/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. FRANCIS A. KAHN, Ill PART 32 Justice --------------------X INDEX NO. 850014/2024 WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, MOTION DATE Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. _ _ _0_0_2_ _ -v- 24 WEST 57 APF LLC,CRIMINAL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, CITY OF NEW YORK ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE, NEW YORK CITY DECISION + ORDER ON DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, NEW YORK CITY MOTION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, JOHN DOES 1- 10, JANE DOES 1-10

Defendant. --------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 002) 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51 were read on this motion to/for MISCELLANEOUS I Upon the foregoing documents, the motion is detennined as follows:

In this action to foreclose on a mortgage encumbering commercial real property located at 24/26 West 57th Street, New York, New York (Block 1217, Lot 20), Plaintiff moves, by ex parte motion.1, pursuant to RPL §254[10] and RP APL §1325 for the appointment of a temporary receiver of the rents of the mortgaged premises. Defendants submitted opposition to the motion.

In section 8.1 [g] of the Mortgage at issue it is provided that upon the occurrence of an event of default, the mortgagee may: I I

apply for the appointment of a receiver, trustee, liquidator or conservator of the Property, without notice to Borrower, which notice Borrower expressly waives, and without regard for the adequacy of the security for the Debt and without regard for the solvency of Borrower, any guarantor or indemnitor under the Loan or any other Person liable for the payment of the Debt and whose appointment Borrower expressly consents to take possession of and to operate the Property and to collect the Rents and to otherwise protect and preserve the Property

Under Real Property Law §254 [ 1O], the appointment of a receiver in the event of a default is proper where the parties to the mortgage agree to same even without notice or without regard to the --~-su-ff;"""1~c~ie~n-cy-ofsecunty (see ADHY Advisors LLC. v 530 W. 152nd St. LLC, 82 AD3d 619 [1 st Dept I 1 A prior ex parte motion for the same relief was denied by order of this Court dated January 26, 2024.

850014'2024 WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION vs. 24 WEST 57 APF LLC ET AL Page1 of4 Motion No. 002

1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 850014/2024 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/13/2024

2011 ]; 366 Fourth St. Corp. v Foxfire Enters., 149 AD2d 692 [2 nd Dept 1989]). Despite the parties' assent, the appointment is not perfunctory and the Court, in the exercise of its equitable power, retains the discretion to deny the appointment of a receiver (see ADHY Advisors LLC. v 530 W. 152nd St. LLC, supra; Nechadim Corp. v Simmons, 171 AD3d 1195, 1197 [2d Dept 2019D. I . . I In the present case, it is undisputed that the parties' mortgage provides that Plaintiff may apply for the appointment of a receiver regardless of the adequacy of the property as security and Plaintiff pled that Defendants defaulted in repayment Accordingly, Plaintiff established its entitlement to the appointment of a receiver of the mortgaged premises (see eg SKW Hillside Bleeker Lender LLC v 145 Bleeker LLC, 217 DD3d 536 [t st Dept 2023 ]; CSFB 2004-C3 Bronx Apts LLC v Sinckler, Inc., 96 AD3d 680 [1 st Dept 2012]).

In opposition, Defendants have not demonstrated that denial of the appointment of a receiver is an appropriate exercise of the Court's discretion (see id.; US Bank, NA. v Rufai, 202 AD3d 719, 721 [2d Dept 2022]; Shaw Funding, LP v Bennett, 185 AD3d 857, 858 [2 nd Dept 2020]). The cases relied on by Defendants regarding what circumstances must exist before a court exercises its discretion to appoint a referee are inapposite. The cited authority predominantly concerns appointment of a receiver absent an express agreement to same pursuant to CPLR §6401 (see eg Groh v Halloran, 86 AD2d 30 [1 st Dept 1982]), The Appellate Division cases are clear that where, as here, the mortgage contains a provision that a lender may ''without notice and without regard for the adequacy of the security for the Debt and without regard for the solvency of Borrower'", under RPL §254[10], that provision denotes that a mortgagee may apply for a receiver '"regardless of proving the necessity for the appointment"' (see GECMC 2007-Cl Ditmars Lodging, LLC v Moho/a, LLC, 84 AD3d 1311, 1312 [2d Dept 2011], citing Naar v. IJ Litwak & Co., 260 AD2d 613 [2d Dept 1999]; see also SKW Hillside Bleeker Lender LLC v 145 Bleeker LLC, supra).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the motion for the appointment of a Temporary Receiver is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that Kenneth A. Kanfer, Esq. ofKanfer & Holtzer LLP is hereby appointed with the usual powers and directions of a Temporary Receiver for the benefit of Plaintiff of all the rents and profits now due and unpaid or become due during the pendency of this action and issuing out the mortgaged property mentioned in the complaint, known by the street addresses as: 24/26 West 57th Street, New York, New York (Block 1217, Lot 20); and it is further

ORDERED that the Temporary Receiver is authorized to take charge and enter into possession of the property; and it is further I ORDERED that before entering her/his duties, the Temporary Receiver shall be sown to fairly and faithfully discharge the duties committed to him and shall execute to the People of the State of New York and file with the Clerk of the Court an undertaking in the sum of$300.000.00 conditioned for the faithful discharge of the duties of Temporary Receiver; and it is further

ORDERED that the Temporary Receiver is hereby directed to demand, collect and receive from -·--------- - the-occupa:iits,-teriaiits·ancffic-e6eeiTripi5ssession of said premises, or other persons liable therefor, inclusive of the mortgagor, all the rents and license fees thereof now due or unpaid or hereafter that 850014/2024 WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIOILASSOCIATION vs. 24 WEST 57 APF LLC ET AL Page 2 of4 Motion No. 002

2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 850014/2024

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/13/2024

become fixed or due and the Temporary Receiver is authorized to institute and carry on all legal proceedings necessary for the protection of said premises or to recover possession of the whole, or any part thereof, and apply to this Court to fix reasonable rental value and license fee value and to compel the tenants and occupants to attom to the Temporary Receiver; and it is further I

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaw Funding, LP v. Bennett
2020 NY Slip Op 3936 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
ADHY Advisors LLC v. 530 West 152nd Street LLC
82 A.D.3d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
GECMC 2007-C1 Ditmars Lodging v. Mohola
84 A.D.3d 1311 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Groh v. Halloran
86 A.D.2d 30 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
366 Fourth Street Corp. v. FoxFire Enterprises, Inc.
149 A.D.2d 692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Naar v. I.J. Litwak & Co.
260 A.D.2d 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 30483(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-fargo-bank-na-v-24-w-57-apf-llc-nysupctnewyork-2024.