WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. GEORGE A. ORDONEZ
This text of WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. GEORGE A. ORDONEZ (WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. GEORGE A. ORDONEZ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3156 ) GEORGE A. ORDONEZ and ) AMARYLLIS ORDONEZ, ) ) Appellees. ) )
Opinion filed May 24, 2019.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Declan P. Mansfield, Judge.
Michael K. Winston and Dean A. Morande of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.
Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, (withdrew after briefing); Angela Leiner of The Law Office of Angela L. Leiner, P.A., for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court's judgment against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. We
hold that the executive branch has already determined that there is no additional tax
due under the unique facts of this case. See § 201.08(5), (6), Fla. Stat. (2010); Fla.
Admin. Code R. 12B-4.052(12)(a) (2010) ("A renewal that does not add obligor(s) and merely changes the interest rate, the maturity date, or the payment terms is not subject
to tax, provided tax was paid on the original document and the original document is
attached to the renewal."). Accordingly, it was reversible error for the trial court to enter
judgment against Well Fargo on this basis.
Reversed and remanded.
KELLY, BADALAMENTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. GEORGE A. ORDONEZ, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-fargo-bank-n-a-v-george-a-ordonez-fladistctapp-2019.