Wells Fargo Advisors, Wichita Falls Branch And Howard Lott v. Loyd Chumley, Trustee as Fiduciary for Larry Jackson Beneficiary
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00366-CV
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS, APPELLANTS WICHITA FALLS BRANCH; AND HOWARD LOTT
V.
LOYD CHUMLEY, TRUSTEE AS APPELLEE FIDUCIARY FOR LARRY JACKSON BENEFICIARY
------------
FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On January 22, 2013, we notified appellants that their brief had not been
filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court
within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex.
R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellants’ brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DELIVERED: April 4, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wells Fargo Advisors, Wichita Falls Branch And Howard Lott v. Loyd Chumley, Trustee as Fiduciary for Larry Jackson Beneficiary (Wells Fargo Advisors, Wichita Falls Branch And Howard Lott v. Loyd Chumley, Trustee as Fiduciary for Larry Jackson Beneficiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.