Wells ex rel. Kehne v. Arave

510 U.S. 1034, 114 S. Ct. 672
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 10, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 510 U.S. 1034 (Wells ex rel. Kehne v. Arave) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells ex rel. Kehne v. Arave, 510 U.S. 1034, 114 S. Ct. 672 (1994).

Opinion

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner denied. Justice Souter and Justice Ginsburg would grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 U.S. 1034, 114 S. Ct. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-ex-rel-kehne-v-arave-scotus-1994.