Wells and Others v. Wilkins, Sheriff, Etc. (Four Cases.) Goldstucker and Others v. Same
This text of 118 U.S. 230 (Wells and Others v. Wilkins, Sheriff, Etc. (Four Cases.) Goldstucker and Others v. Same) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
6 S.Ct. 1049
30 L.Ed. 210
WELLS and others
v.
WILKINS, Sheriff, etc. (Four Cases.)
GOLDSTUCKER and others
v.
SAME.
Filed May 10, 1886.
Alex. Porter Morse and J. D. Thompson, for the motion.
C. C. Yonge, Sr., in opposition.
WAITE, C. J.
These motions are denied. The additional affidavits which have been filed fail to satisfy us that the value of the matter in dispute is sufficient to give us jurisdiction. While the aggregate of the values in all the suits may exceed $5,000, it is clear to our minds that the value of the property involved in no one of the suits reaches that sum, or anything like it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 U.S. 230, 6 S. Ct. 1049, 30 L. Ed. 210, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-and-others-v-wilkins-sheriff-etc-four-cases-goldstucker-and-scotus-1886.