Wells and Others v. Wilkins, Sheriff, Etc. (Four Cases.) Goldstucker and Others v. Same

118 U.S. 230, 6 S. Ct. 1049, 30 L. Ed. 210, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1924
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 10, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

118 U.S. 230

6 S.Ct. 1049

30 L.Ed. 210

WELLS and others
v.
WILKINS, Sheriff, etc. (Four Cases.)
GOLDSTUCKER and others
v.
SAME.

Filed May 10, 1886.

Alex. Porter Morse and J. D. Thompson, for the motion.

C. C. Yonge, Sr., in opposition.

WAITE, C. J.

These motions are denied. The additional affidavits which have been filed fail to satisfy us that the value of the matter in dispute is sufficient to give us jurisdiction. While the aggregate of the values in all the suits may exceed $5,000, it is clear to our minds that the value of the property involved in no one of the suits reaches that sum, or anything like it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wells and Others v. Wilkins, Sheriff, Etc. (Four Cases.) Goldstucker and Others v. Same, 118 U.S. 230, 6 S. Ct. 1049, 30 L. Ed. 210, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1924 (1886).

118 U.S. 230 (Wells and Others v. Wilkins, Sheriff, Etc. (Four Cases.) Goldstucker and Others v. Same) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lamb v. Thompson
70 S.E. 507 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1911)
Covington Bro's. & Co. v. Jordan
100 S.W. 326 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1907)