Wellons v. McCartha

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wellons v. McCartha

101 S.E. 775, 24 Ga. App. 652, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 431

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 6, 1920

Docket10847

StatusPublished

This text of 101 S.E. 775 (Wellons v. McCartha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wellons v. McCartha, 101 S.E. 775, 24 Ga. App. 652, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 431 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court cannot interfere with it. It was not error to overrule the demurrer to the suit, nor did the court err in admitting the evidence objected to by the defendant. The admission of such evidence was not harmful to the defendant. Eor no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court cannot interfere with it. It was not error to overrule the demurrer to the suit, nor did the court err in admitting the evidence objected to by the defendant. The admission of such evidence was not harmful to the defendant. Eor no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 S.E. 775, 24 Ga. App. 652, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wellons-v-mccartha-gactapp-1920.