Wellman v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n

21 N.Y.S. 577, 73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 331, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 254, 66 Hun 331
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 12, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 21 N.Y.S. 577 (Wellman v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wellman v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n, 21 N.Y.S. 577, 73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 331, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 254, 66 Hun 331 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

The complaint states that the libel in question charged that Sophia Wellman, the plaintiff’s wife, died under circumstances which aroused her husband’s suspicion that she had caused her own death by procuring a miscarriage upon her person. The article states that the plaintiff was a lawyer. The complaint states that the article was published to injure the plaintiff. No cause of action is stated in favor of the plaintiff. The injurious publication solely affects the deceased lady, and is a personal wrong which died with her. Cregin v. Railroad Co., 75 N. Y. 192.

There is an allegation that the article was published of and concerning the plaintiff. No libelous statement against him is made in it. The mere statement in the complaint that the article was published of and concerning the plaintiff does not, under the principle that a demurrer admits the complaint, make out a cause of action. Fleischmann v. Bennett, 87 N. Y. 231. The facts stated are at variance with this allegation. The libel is upon the wife. The libel is not supported by reason of the plaintiff’s professional character being injured by the "libel. No charge is made against the professional character of plaintiff, and no legal reason exists why the plaintiff, as a lawyer, should be injured by it. The order sustaining the demurrer should therefore be affirmed, with- costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frick v. Stevens
43 Pa. D. & C.2d 6 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1967)
Kelly v. Johnson Publishing Co.
325 P.2d 659 (California Court of Appeal, 1958)
Feinstein v. Kaye
185 Misc. 185 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)
Hughes v. New England Newspaper Publishing Co.
43 N.E.2d 657 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)
Renfro Drug Co. v. Lawson
160 S.W.2d 246 (Texas Supreme Court, 1942)
Rose v. Daily Mirror, Inc.
31 N.E.2d 182 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)
Renfro Drug Co. v. Lawson
144 S.W.2d 417 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Rose v. Daily Mirror, Inc.
259 A.D. 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1940)
Ryan v. Hearst Publications, Inc.
100 P.2d 24 (Washington Supreme Court, 1940)
Benton v. Knoxville News-Sentinel Co.
130 S.W.2d 106 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1939)
Groggins v. Daily Mirror, Inc.
241 A.D. 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Eagles v. Liberty Weekly, Inc.
137 Misc. 575 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)
In re Fleming
223 A.D. 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)
Saucer v. Giroux
202 P. 887 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)
Garrison v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n
74 Misc. 622 (New York Supreme Court, 1911)
Merrill v. Post Publishing Co.
83 N.E. 419 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
Lehmann v. Tribune Ass'n
37 Misc. 506 (New York Supreme Court, 1902)
Bosi v. New York Herald Co.
33 Misc. 622 (New York Supreme Court, 1901)
Bradt v. New Nonpareil Co.
45 L.R.A. 681 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 N.Y.S. 577, 73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 331, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 254, 66 Hun 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wellman-v-sun-printing-publishing-assn-nysupct-1892.