Wellman v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wellman v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

559 So. 2d 707, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2378, 1990 WL 41587

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 11, 1990

DocketNo. 90-501

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 559 So. 2d 707 (Wellman v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wellman v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 559 So. 2d 707, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2378, 1990 WL 41587 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for habeas corpus, and other extraordinary relief. Petitioners have failed to show an entitlement to habe-as corpus in this case, particularly where they stipulated to the order of dependency which they now challenge. In Interest of M.S., 455 So.2d 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). The petitioners also request relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.830, but that relief must be addressed to the trial court first. As to the request for mandamus directed to the trial court to rule on several motions filed by petitioners, the record reflects that hearings have not been held, apparently because of the clerk’s misfiling of documents. This furnishes no ground at this time for the issuance of an extraordinary writ.

WALDEN, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We deny the petition for habeas corpus, and other extraordinary relief. Petitioners have failed to show an entitlement to habe-as corpus in this case, particularly where they stipulated to the order of dependency which they now challenge. In Interest of M.S., 455 So.2d 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). The petitioners also request relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.830, but that relief must be addressed to the trial court first. As to the request for mandamus directed to the trial court to rule on several motions filed by petitioners, the record reflects that hearings have not been held, apparently because of the clerk’s misfiling of documents. This furnishes no ground at this time for the issuance of an extraordinary writ.

WALDEN, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 So. 2d 707, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2378, 1990 WL 41587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wellman-v-state-department-of-health-rehabilitative-services-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack