Wellington v. Wellington

192 A. 153, 88 N.H. 482, 1937 N.H. LEXIS 84
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedMay 4, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 192 A. 153 (Wellington v. Wellington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wellington v. Wellington, 192 A. 153, 88 N.H. 482, 1937 N.H. LEXIS 84 (N.H. 1937).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“The issue as to laches is primarily one of fact” (Hould v. Company, 83 N. H. 474, 476, and cases cited), and it cannot be said that an unexplained delay of from seven years and eight months to twelve years and eight months requires a finding of reasonable diligence as a matter of law.

It is frivolous to suggest that the court may not take judicial notice of its own records for any purpose for which those records may become material. Wigmore, Evidence, s. 2579.

Exceptions overruled.

Allen, C. J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Rodney Boughton and Erica Trueman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2019
Stone v. Stone
276 A.2d 924 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1971)
Cote v. Cote
54 A.2d 360 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 A. 153, 88 N.H. 482, 1937 N.H. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wellington-v-wellington-nh-1937.