Wellington v. Wellington

192 A. 153, 88 N.H. 482, 1937 N.H. LEXIS 84
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided May 4, 1937·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“The issue as to laches is primarily one of fact” (Hould v. Company, 83 N. H. 474, 476, and cases cited), and it cannot be said that an unexplained delay of from seven years and eight months to twelve years and eight months requires a finding of reasonable diligence as a matter of law.

It is frivolous to suggest that the court may not take judicial notice of its own records for any purpose for which those records may become material. Wigmore, Evidence, s. 2579.

Exceptions overruled.

Allen, C. J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wellington v. Wellington, 192 A. 153, 88 N.H. 482, 1937 N.H. LEXIS 84 (N.H. 1937).

192 A. 153 (Wellington v. Wellington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Rodney Boughton and Erica Trueman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2019
Stone v. Stone
276 A.2d 924 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1971)
Cote v. Cote
54 A.2d 360 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1947)