Wellington v. State
This text of 52 Ark. 447 (Wellington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Since that time the act regulating fees has been amended, but as to the items of fees of Prosecuting Attorneys, the act of 1868 and the amendatory act of 1875 are identical, except as to the amount allowed for convictions in cases of homicide not capital. There is no repeal, express or implied, and the fee was properly taxed as part of the costs. Chamberlain v. State, 50 Ark., 132.
The right of the Legislature to impose 10 per cent, damages upon affirmance has long been conceded and affirme'd by this court. The provision imposing it (section 2471) is not unconstitutional.
The tax of three dollars complained of is imposed by section 5595 Mansf. Dig., and has heretofore been held a valid exaction.
The amount of $5.75 for printing the appellee’s brief is taxed under rule 23 of this court, which is based upon section 1307 of Mansf. Dig.
These charges are not part of the punishment of the accused. Costs are awarded in order that the State may prosecute the guilty at their own expense. Fanning v. State, 47 Ark., 442.
Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 Ark. 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wellington-v-state-ark-1889.