Wellington v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections

895 N.E.2d 847, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1508
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 31, 2008·No. 2008-1936·Published

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause came on for further consideration of the motion by amicus curiae, David P. Aey, for clarification in an expedited election case.

It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wellington v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections, 895 N.E.2d 847, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1508 (Ohio 2008).

895 N.E.2d 847 (Wellington v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.