Wellford v. Miller

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Wellford v. Miller

29 F. Cas. 621, 1 Cranch 485

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 29 F. Cas. 621 (Wellford v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wellford v. Miller, 29 F. Cas. 621, 1 Cranch 485 (circtddc 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent)

suffered the commission to issue in the chancery suit, considering it as in aid of the general commission heretofore awarded. But refused it in the common-law case, because the witnesses (residing within one hundred miles) might be summoned to attend this court personally.

The law of Virginia of 29th Nov. 1792, § 13, p. 279, was cited by Mr. Youngs, which allows a commission to issue when the witness resides beyond sea, or in a foreign country, or in any other of the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent)

suffered the commission to issue in the chancery suit, considering it as in aid of the general commission heretofore awarded. But refused it in the common-law case, because the witnesses (residing within one hundred miles) might be summoned to attend this court personally.

The law of Virginia of 29th Nov. 1792, § 13, p. 279, was cited by Mr. Youngs, which allows a commission to issue when the witness resides beyond sea, or in a foreign country, or in any other of the United States.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 F. Cas. 621, 1 Cranch 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wellford-v-miller-circtddc-1808.