Wellens v. Dillon

302 F.2d 442
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 6, 1962
DocketNo. 17634
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 302 F.2d 442 (Wellens v. Dillon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wellens v. Dillon, 302 F.2d 442 (9th Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Bureau of Old Age and Survivors Insurance of the Social Security Administration of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare determined that appellant was not entitled to old age insurance benefits for the years 1959 and 1960 because of the extent of his employment or self-employment during those years. § 203(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 403(b).

Appellant thereupon commenced proceedings for reconsideration and review of such determination pursuant to § 205 (b) of the Act, which proceedings are still pending.

On March 16, 1961, notwithstanding the pending administrative proceedings, appellant petitioned the district court for a writ of mandamus compelling the secretary to pay him old age benefits. On motion of the appellee, the action was dismissed and this appeal followed.

Section 205(g) of the Act provides for direct judicial review of final decisions of the secretary made under § 205(b). Section 205(h) provides in part:

“No findings of fact or decision of the Secretary shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as herein provided.”

Since the statutory remedy is thus made exclusive, it was proper to dismiss the present proceedings.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kozlosky v. Gardner
45 Pa. D. & C.2d 364 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1967)
Wellens v. Dillon
302 F.2d 442 (First Circuit, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 F.2d 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wellens-v-dillon-ca9-1962.