Wellborn v. State

45 So. 646, 154 Ala. 79, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 519
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided February 6, 1908·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

The only question presented for our consideration is the action of the trial court in striking, on motion of the solicitor, the defendant’s plea of misnomer. The defendant was indicted by his initials “W. J.,” and it is averred in the indictment that the defendant’s Christian name is unknown to the grand jury, otherwise than as stated in the indictment. The plea set up that the defendant’s true name was “James Wellborn,” and by that name he was known and called, etc. The averment in the indictment that the defendant’s name was unknown to the grand jury, otherwise than as stated, made the indictment, sufficent under the statute. The plea was properly stricken on the motion. — Gerrish v. State, 53 Ala. 476; Noblin v. State, 100 Ala. 13, 14 South. 767; Winter v. State, 90 Ala. 637, 8 South. 556.

No error appearing on the record, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., and Anderson and McClellan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wellborn v. State, 45 So. 646, 154 Ala. 79, 1908 Ala. LEXIS 519 (Ala. 1908).

45 So. 646 (Wellborn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poole v. State
1 So. 2d 661 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1941)
Leith v. State
101 So. 336 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Du Bose v. State
99 So. 746 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Jones v. State
61 So. 434 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1913)
Strange v. State
59 So. 691 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)