Welland v. Juvenile Officer of St. Louis County

Missouri Court of Appeals

Welland v. Juvenile Officer of St. Louis County

71 S.W.3d 244, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 612, 2002 WL 452458

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 26, 2002

DocketNo. ED 79982

StatusPublished

This text of 71 S.W.3d 244 (Welland v. Juvenile Officer of St. Louis County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Welland v. Juvenile Officer of St. Louis County, 71 S.W.3d 244, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 612, 2002 WL 452458 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cheryl Welland (Mother) appeals from a trial court judgment terminating her parental rights to her two minor children, C.W. and M.W., pursuant to Section 211.447 RSMo. (2000). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment of the trial court terminating Mother’s parental rights to C.W. and M.W. is supported by substantial evidence and not against the weight of the evidence. In the Interest of F.N.M., 951 S.W.2d 702, 703 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cheryl Welland (Mother) appeals from a trial court judgment terminating her parental rights to her two minor children, C.W. and M.W., pursuant to Section 211.447 RSMo. (2000). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the judgment of the trial court terminating Mother’s parental rights to C.W. and M.W. is supported by substantial evidence and not against the weight of the evidence. In the Interest of F.N.M., 951 S.W.2d 702, 703 (Mo.App. E.D.1997). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 S.W.3d 244, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 612, 2002 WL 452458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welland-v-juvenile-officer-of-st-louis-county-moctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack