Well v. Well
This text of 909 So. 2d 951 (Well v. Well) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss an amended petition for modification of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We dismiss the appeal for lack of an appealable order.
An order denying a motion to dismiss is not an appealable order unless it falls within one of the exceptions enumerated in the appellate rules. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130; Morton & Oxley, Ltd. v. Eby, 30 Fla. L. Weekly D 1107, — So.2d -, 2005 WL 991675 (Fla. 2d DCA April 29, 2005); Grafman v. Grafman, 488 So.2d 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). There is no applicable exception in this case.
Appeal dismissed.
Although the merits are not now before us, the parties' attention is invited to Sekot Laboratories, Inc. v. Gleason, 585 So.2d 286 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
909 So. 2d 951, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13591, 2005 WL 2027681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/well-v-well-fladistctapp-2005.