Well Go USA, Inc. v. Unknown Participants in Filesharing Swarm Identified by Hash B7fec872874d0cc9b1372ece5ed07ad7420a3bbb

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJuly 26, 2013
DocketCivil Action No. 2011-1946
StatusPublished

This text of Well Go USA, Inc. v. Unknown Participants in Filesharing Swarm Identified by Hash B7fec872874d0cc9b1372ece5ed07ad7420a3bbb (Well Go USA, Inc. v. Unknown Participants in Filesharing Swarm Identified by Hash B7fec872874d0cc9b1372ece5ed07ad7420a3bbb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Well Go USA, Inc. v. Unknown Participants in Filesharing Swarm Identified by Hash B7fec872874d0cc9b1372ece5ed07ad7420a3bbb, (D.D.C. 2013).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) WELL GO USA, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1946 (ABJ) ) UNKNOWN PARTICIPANTS IN ) FILESHARING SWARM IDENTIFIED ) BY HASH: B7FEC872874DOCC9B- ) 1372ECE5ED07AD7420A3BBB, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)

ORDER

On July 8, 2013, Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola issued a Report and a

Recommendation [Dkt. # 9] that plaintiff’s case be dismissed with prejudice for failure to

comply with Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule

72.3(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d), any written objections to Magistrate Judge

Facciola’s Report and Recommendation were due within 14 days. The Report and

Recommendation informed plaintiff that “[f]ailure to file timely objections to the findings and

recommendations set forth in this report may waive your right of appeal from an order of the

District Court adopting such findings and recommendations.” Report at 1–2, citing Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Eighteen days have passed since Magistrate Judge Facciola’s Report

and Recommendation, and plaintiff has failed to file any objections. Therefore, after reviewing Magistrate Judge Facciola’s report, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 9] is ADOPTED; and for the

reasons set forth in the Report, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s case is dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge

DATE: July 26, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Well Go USA, Inc. v. Unknown Participants in Filesharing Swarm Identified by Hash B7fec872874d0cc9b1372ece5ed07ad7420a3bbb, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/well-go-usa-inc-v-unknown-participants-in-fileshar-dcd-2013.