Welk v. Sorenson

179 Cal. 604
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 27, 1919
DocketL. A. No. 4721
StatusPublished

This text of 179 Cal. 604 (Welk v. Sorenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welk v. Sorenson, 179 Cal. 604 (Cal. 1919).

Opinion

MELVIN, J.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to credit the sum of $15 costs (for which judgment had been entered in favor of Grace A. Sorenson) upon a judgment against her codefendant in the same action, Albert Sorenson, the appellant basing the argument against the order largely upon the case of Adams v. Baker, 24 Nev. 375, [55 Pac. 362].

The appeal is by the alternative method, but appellant neither prints any of the record in the brief nor designates in any way the parts of the transcript upon which the alleged “statement of facts” is based. We will not, therefore, consider the brief. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 953c; Estate of Keith, 175 Cal. 26, [165 Pac. 10]; Miller v. Oliver, 174 Cal. 404, [163 Pac. 357].)

Order affirmed.

Wilbur, J., and Lennon, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Oliver
163 P. 357 (California Supreme Court, 1917)
In Re Estate of Keith
165 P. 10 (California Supreme Court, 1917)
Adams v. Baker
55 P. 362 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 Cal. 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welk-v-sorenson-cal-1919.