Home/New York Court of Appeals/Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works

Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works

76 N.E. 1116, 184 N.Y. 519, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1395
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 6, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 76 N.E. 1116 (Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works, 76 N.E. 1116, 184 N.Y. 519, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1395 (N.Y. 1906).

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on dissenting opinion of Woodward, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien and Edward T. Bartlett, JJ.; Werner, J., concurs in result on the ground that the structure in cpiestion was a scaffold, but not com-'pleted, and that plaintiff’s participation in the erection thereof precluded his recovery. Dissenting: Hiscock and Chase, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bohannon v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.
219 N.E.2d 627 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1966)
Frick v. O'Hare-Chicago Corp.
217 N.E.2d 552 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1966)
Broderick v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co.
93 N.E.2d 629 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 N.E. 1116, 184 N.Y. 519, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welk-v-jackson-architectural-iron-works-ny-1906.