Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works
76 N.E. 1116, 184 N.Y. 519, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1395
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on dissenting opinion of Woodward, J., below.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien and Edward T. Bartlett, JJ.; Werner, J., concurs in result on the ground that the structure in cpiestion was a scaffold, but not com-'pleted, and that plaintiff’s participation in the erection thereof precluded his recovery. Dissenting: Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works, 76 N.E. 1116, 184 N.Y. 519, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1395 (N.Y. 1906).
76 N.E. 1116 (Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bohannon v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.
219 N.E.2d 627 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1966)
Frick v. O'Hare-Chicago Corp.
217 N.E.2d 552 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1966)
Broderick v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co.
93 N.E.2d 629 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)