Welham v. Lingham

28 La. Ann. 903
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 15, 1876·No. No. 5129·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Wyly, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment herein, compelling him to pay plaintiff the amount due on a contract of lease. The defense is, plaintiff failed to make the repairs specified in the answer, after being [904] notified, and, in consequence, defendant abandoned the premises. The required repairs, it is shown, would not have cost exceeding fifty dollars.

We think defendant had no sufficient ground to violate the contract of lease. His remedy was to pursue the course pointed out by article 2694 of the Revised Code, which authorizes the lessee to make himself the repairs which the lessor was required but failed to make, after being notified to do so, and deduct the price from the rent. 3 R. 52; 4 R. 428; 5 An. 760.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Welham v. Lingham, 28 La. Ann. 903 (La. 1876).

28 La. Ann. 903 (Welham v. Lingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

May v. Schepis
147 So. 717 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1933)
Boutte v. New Orleans Terminal Co.
72 So. 513 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)
Brodtman v. Finerty
41 So. 329 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1906)