Weldon E. Wiggins v. Alameda County Board of Supervisors
This text of 54 F.3d 786 (Weldon E. Wiggins v. Alameda County Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
54 F.3d 786
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Weldon E. WIGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-16362.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 1995.*
Decided May 22, 1995.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
California state prisoner Weldon Wiggins appeals pro se the district court's sua sponte dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action prior to issuance and service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291.
To the extent Wiggins raised Eighth Amendment claims, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. To the extent Wiggins raised First Amendment claims, we find them to be constitutionally insubstantial. See Franklin v. Oregon, 662 F.2d 1337, 1342 (9th Cir 1981).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 F.3d 786, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22375, 1995 WL 309951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weldon-e-wiggins-v-alameda-county-board-of-supervi-ca9-1995.