Welder Exploration and Production, Inc. v. Cactus Compression, Inc.
This text of Welder Exploration and Production, Inc. v. Cactus Compression, Inc. (Welder Exploration and Production, Inc. v. Cactus Compression, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-23-00420-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
WELDER EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC., Appellant,
v.
CACTUS COMPRESSION, INC., Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 36TH DISTRICT COURT OF BEE COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña This matter is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss appeal.
Appellant requests dismissal stating that the parties have resolved this matter by
agreement. The Court, having considered appellant’s motion, is of the opinion that the motion
should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1) (allowing the Court to “dismiss the
appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order unless such disposition would prevent a
party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled”). Accordingly, we grant
the unopposed motion to dismiss, and we dismiss the appeal. In accordance with the
motion to dismiss, each party will bear its own costs. See id. R. 42.1(d). Because the
appeal is dismissed at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.
L. ARON PEÑA JR. Justice
Delivered and filed on the 22nd day of August, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Welder Exploration and Production, Inc. v. Cactus Compression, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welder-exploration-and-production-inc-v-cactus-compression-inc-texapp-2024.