Welden v. Clifford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Welden v. Clifford

82 S.E. 636, 15 Ga. App. 93, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 29

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 1, 1914

Docket5456

StatusPublished

This text of 82 S.E. 636 (Welden v. Clifford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Welden v. Clifford, 82 S.E. 636, 15 Ga. App. 93, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 29 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

The instructions of the trial judge were not prejudicial, in view of the contentions of the parties as presented by the evidence. It was within the exclusive province of the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses; and since the evidence in behalf of the prevailing party authorized the verdict, the judgment refusing a new trial was not error. Judgment affirmed.

Roan, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, C. J.

The instructions of the trial judge were not prejudicial, in view of the contentions of the parties as presented by the evidence. It was within the exclusive province of the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses; and since the evidence in behalf of the prevailing party authorized the verdict, the judgment refusing a new trial was not error. Judgment affirmed.

Roan, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 S.E. 636, 15 Ga. App. 93, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welden-v-clifford-gactapp-1914.