Weld v. Gorham
10 Mass. 366
Opinion
The jury have determined the only question that could arise in the case, upon evidence which was properly left to them, and upon which they might lawfully presume a demand and notice such as the law requires, to render the defendant'liable as endorser. The verdict is correctly found upon this evidence, and judgment is to be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Weld v. Gorham, 10 Mass. 366 (Mass. 1813).
10 Mass. 366 (Weld v. Gorham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maine Bank v. Smith
18 Me. 99 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1841)
Scribner v. Whitcher
6 N.H. 63 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1832)
Varner v. Inhabitants of Nobleborough
2 Me. 121 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1822)
The President, Directors, & Co. v. Hammatt
9 Mass. 159 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1812)
Vandusen v. Comstock
3 Mass. 184 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1807)