Weld v. Gorham
10 Mass. 366
This text of 10 Mass. 366 (Weld v. Gorham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Weld v. Gorham, 10 Mass. 366 (Mass. 1813).
Opinion
The jury have determined the only question that could arise in the case, upon evidence which was properly left to them, and upon which they might lawfully presume a demand and notice such as the law requires, to render the defendant'liable as endorser. The verdict is correctly found upon this evidence, and judgment is to be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Maine Bank v. Smith
18 Me. 99 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1841)
Scribner v. Whitcher
6 N.H. 63 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1832)
Varner v. Inhabitants of Nobleborough
2 Me. 121 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1822)
The President, Directors, & Co. v. Hammatt
9 Mass. 159 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1812)
Vandusen v. Comstock
3 Mass. 184 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1807)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Mass. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weld-v-gorham-mass-1813.