Welch v. Welch

Supreme Court of Florida

Welch v. Welch

152 So. 173, 112 Fla. 590, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2311

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 7, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 152 So. 173 (Welch v. Welch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Welch v. Welch, 152 So. 173, 112 Fla. 590, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2311 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a divorce suit brought by the husband against the wife. The decree was against the wife who has appealed. A careful review of the evidence discloses that the Chancellor’s conclusions in favor of the husband, of the issuable facts, are amply supported and that they should not be reversed. Foxworth v. Maddox, 103 Fla. 32, 137 Sou. Rep. 161; Wetherington v. Wetherington, 57 Fla. 551, 49 Sou. Rep. 549; Palmer v. Palmer, 26 Fla. 215, 7 Sou. Rep. 864; Beekman v. Beekman, 53 Fla. 858, 43 Sou. Rep. 923. Recrimination as a bar to a divorce otherwise grantable (except where adultery is the basis of the recrimination) should be fully asserted as an affirmative defense in the answer, and pleaded with the same particularity as a charge in a complaint for divorce. Newman *591 v. Newman, 211 Mass. 508, 98 N. E. Rep. 507, Ann. Cas. 1913B 672. In cases of adultery, the court, iti its discretion, may take notice of it as a bar by way of recrimination, even though not pleaded, if the complainant’s adultery appears evident from the proofs. Fisher v. Fisher, 95 Md. 314, 52 Atl. Rep. 898, 93 A. S. R. 334. Recrimination was hot legally established by pleading or proof in this case. No charge of adultery on either side was alleged or shown. So the decree appealed from should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was a divorce suit brought by the husband against the wife. The decree was against the wife who has appealed. A careful review of the evidence discloses that the Chancellor’s conclusions in favor of the husband, of the issuable facts, are amply supported and that they should not be reversed. Foxworth v. Maddox, 103 Fla. 32, 137 Sou. Rep. 161; Wetherington v. Wetherington, 57 Fla. 551, 49 Sou. Rep. 549; Palmer v. Palmer, 26 Fla. 215, 7 Sou. Rep. 864; Beekman v. Beekman, 53 Fla. 858, 43 Sou. Rep. 923. Recrimination as a bar to a divorce otherwise grantable (except where adultery is the basis of the recrimination) should be fully asserted as an affirmative defense in the answer, and pleaded with the same particularity as a charge in a complaint for divorce. Newman *591 v. Newman, 211 Mass. 508, 98 N. E. Rep. 507, Ann. Cas. 1913B 672. In cases of adultery, the court, iti its discretion, may take notice of it as a bar by way of recrimination, even though not pleaded, if the complainant’s adultery appears evident from the proofs. Fisher v. Fisher, 95 Md. 314, 52 Atl. Rep. 898, 93 A. S. R. 334. Recrimination was hot legally established by pleading or proof in this case. No charge of adultery on either side was alleged or shown. So the decree appealed from should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 So. 173, 112 Fla. 590, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-welch-fla-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack