Welch v. Watts
9 Ind. 115
Opinion
By the statute (2 R. S. p. 110, subs. 5), the Court is bound to instruct the jury, unless the parties consent to dispense with instructions.
A promissory note is, prima fade, sufficient evidence to justify the entry of judgment against the maker, in a suit on the note; and, to defeat such judgment, in such suit, the maker, defendant, must establish, to the satisfaction of the jury, a legal defense to the note. No defense, whatever, was proved in this case.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Welch v. Watts, 9 Ind. 115 (Ind. 1857).
9 Ind. 115 (Welch v. Watts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gradeless v. Gradeless, Admr.
49 N.E.2d 398 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1943)
Taggart v. Keebler
154 N.E. 485 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1926)
Saint v. Guerrerio
17 Colo. 448 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1892)
Krack v. Wolf
39 Ind. 88 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)