Welch v. Tennent

California Supreme Court

Welch v. Tennent

4 Cal. 203

California Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1854·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred,

The affidavit in this case is insufficient to show "that the Federal Court has jurisdiction of the suit. It does not appear that the contest is between a citizen of this State and citizens of a foreign State.

[204]*204[204] *Tbis is sufficient to reverse the order; and we rest upon it, reserving for a future occasion to determine whether such a removal can in any event be permitted.

Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred,

The affidavit in this case is insufficient to show "that the Federal Court has jurisdiction of the suit. It does not appear that the contest is between a citizen of this State and citizens of a foreign State.

[204]*204[204] *Tbis is sufficient to reverse the order; and we rest upon it, reserving for a future occasion to determine whether such a removal can in any event be permitted.

Order reversed.

Welch v. Tennent, 4 Cal. 203 (Cal. 1854).

Pincite

4 Cal. 203 (Welch v. Tennent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related