Welch v. Tennent

California Supreme Court

Welch v. Tennent

4 Cal. 203

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1854

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 Cal. 203 (Welch v. Tennent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Welch v. Tennent, 4 Cal. 203 (Cal. 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred,

The affidavit in this case is insufficient to show "that the Federal Court has jurisdiction of the suit. It does not appear that the contest is between a citizen of this State and citizens of a foreign State.

[204]*204[204] *Tbis is sufficient to reverse the order; and we rest upon it, reserving for a future occasion to determine whether such a removal can in any event be permitted.

Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred,

The affidavit in this case is insufficient to show "that the Federal Court has jurisdiction of the suit. It does not appear that the contest is between a citizen of this State and citizens of a foreign State.

[204]*204[204] *Tbis is sufficient to reverse the order; and we rest upon it, reserving for a future occasion to determine whether such a removal can in any event be permitted.

Order reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cal. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-tennent-cal-1854.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack