Welch v. Sullivan
This text of 1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 356 (Welch v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California District Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action the remittitur of the supreme court, with the opinion of the judges, has been filed, directing the judgment of this court should be modified in accordance with the opinion, with costs for the appellants. It appears that the plaintiff has proceeded to have a modified judgment entered in the clerk’s office, without notice to the' defendant, or application to this court. The question involved is this : Is the entry of the modified judgment a ministerial act to be performed by the clerk, under §358 of the Practice Act, or a judicial act, to be first ordered by the court ? The proper practice, according to my opinion, in entering judgment upon the remittitur of the supreme court, is for the clerk to do it when the supreme court specifically direct the particular judgment to be entered; but, if the court indicate the error, and require the judgment to be modified according to the opinion forwarded with the remittitur, the entry of the modified judgment is a judicial act, and application should be made to the court. The entry of the modified judgment was irregular, and must be set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-sullivan-caldistct-1857.