Welch v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Welch v. State

1931 OK CR 21, 295 P. 234, 49 Okla. Crim. 406, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 18

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 10, 1931

DocketNo. A-7720.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 21 (Welch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Welch v. State, 1931 OK CR 21, 295 P. 234, 49 Okla. Crim. 406, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 18 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

*407 EDWARDS, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district conrt of Cotton county of selling- intoxicating liquor to a minor, and was sentenced to serve two and one-half years in the penitentiary.

The judgment of conviction was rendered in October, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in January, 1930. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed and no appearance for oral argument was made at the time the case was submitted.

Where an appeal from a conviction for a felony is prosecuted to this court and no briefs in support of it are filed nor oral argument made, this court will not search the record to discover some error upon which to predicate a reversal, but will examine the record for jurisdictional or fundamental errors and to ascertain if the evidence reasonably supports the verdict and judgment. In .this case, we have examined the record with care and have read closely the testimony. We find no jurisdictional or fundamental errors and find abundant evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*407 EDWARDS, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district conrt of Cotton county of selling- intoxicating liquor to a minor, and was sentenced to serve two and one-half years in the penitentiary.

The judgment of conviction was rendered in October, 1929, and the appeal was lodged in this court in January, 1930. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed and no appearance for oral argument was made at the time the case was submitted.

Where an appeal from a conviction for a felony is prosecuted to this court and no briefs in support of it are filed nor oral argument made, this court will not search the record to discover some error upon which to predicate a reversal, but will examine the record for jurisdictional or fundamental errors and to ascertain if the evidence reasonably supports the verdict and judgment. In .this case, we have examined the record with care and have read closely the testimony. We find no jurisdictional or fundamental errors and find abundant evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 21, 295 P. 234, 49 Okla. Crim. 406, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.