Welch v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Welch v. State

1913 OK CR 55, 128 P. 912, 8 Okla. Crim. 740, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 453

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 25, 1912

DocketNo. A-1458.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 55 (Welch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Welch v. State, 1913 OK CR 55, 128 P. 912, 8 Okla. Crim. 740, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 453 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CURIAM:

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Okfuskee county on an information which charged that he did have in his possession intoxicating liquors with intent to violate provisions of the prohibition law. September 8, 1911, he was sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and to be confined in the county jail for 30 days. An appeal was properly perfected. It is our opinion that the ' assignments of error are without merit. The testimony of the officers show that they found intoxicating liquors in the possession of the defendant in his pool hall at the town of Boley. There was evidence also of the payment of the special tax required by liauor dealers of the United States. No reversible error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CURIAM:

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Okfuskee county on an information which charged that he did have in his possession intoxicating liquors with intent to violate provisions of the prohibition law. September 8, 1911, he was sentenced to pay a fine of fifty dollars and to be confined in the county jail for 30 days. An appeal was properly perfected. It is our opinion that the ' assignments of error are without merit. The testimony of the officers show that they found intoxicating liquors in the possession of the defendant in his pool hall at the town of Boley. There was evidence also of the payment of the special tax required by liauor dealers of the United States. No reversible error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 55, 128 P. 912, 8 Okla. Crim. 740, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.