Welch v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Welch v. State

364 S.W.3d 264, 2012 WL 1243094, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 463

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 2012·No. ED 96981·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Welch appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Welch appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).

Welch v. State, 364 S.W.3d 264, 2012 WL 1243094, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 463 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

364 S.W.3d 264 (Welch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.