Welch v. State
This text of 140 S.E. 425 (Welch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The court did not err in refusing to charge the jury as requested by counsel for the defendant. The request was not in writing and was not adjusted to the facts, ndr did it contain a correct jiroposition of law.
2. There is some evidence to support the verdict; .and “whenever there is any evidence, however slight, to support a verdict which has been approved by the trial judge, this court is absolutely without authority to control the judgment of the trial court.” Bradham v. State, 21 Ga. App. 510 (94 S. E. 618).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E. 425, 37 Ga. App. 380, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-state-gactapp-1927.