Welch v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Welch v. State

115 S.E. 38, 29 Ga. App. 269, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 232

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 12, 1922

Docket13821

StatusPublished

This text of 115 S.E. 38 (Welch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Welch v. State, 115 S.E. 38, 29 Ga. App. 269, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 232 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence for the State was believed by the jury, and the trial judge has approved the verdict of guilty. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of evidence, are without merit. Eor no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. J. B. Moore, II. L. Williams, for plaintiff in error. G. H. Parker, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence for the State was believed by the jury, and the trial judge has approved the verdict of guilty. The special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of evidence, are without merit. Eor no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. J. B. Moore, II. L. Williams, for plaintiff in error. G. H. Parker, solicitor, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 S.E. 38, 29 Ga. App. 269, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-state-gactapp-1922.