Welch v. State

756 So. 2d 202, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4396, 2000 WL 378254
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Welch v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 741 So. 2d 1268
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 2000·No. No. 2D99-4732·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert C. Welch appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct sentence to reflect additional jail credit, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm based on Welch’s failure to comply with the pleading requirements of State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998). Because Welch alleges that the requested jail credit was determined as part of a plea agreement, this affir-mance is without prejudice to Welch’s ability, if any, to raise this issue in a properly pleaded rule 3.800(a) motion or in a timely, properly sworn motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed.

WHATLEY, A.C.J., and NORTHCUTT and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Welch v. State, 756 So. 2d 202, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4396, 2000 WL 378254 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

756 So. 2d 202 (Welch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)