Welch v. Robert Campbell, Inc.

321 So. 2d 523
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedOctober 22, 1975
Docket56903
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 321 So. 2d 523 (Welch v. Robert Campbell, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welch v. Robert Campbell, Inc., 321 So. 2d 523 (La. 1975).

Opinion

321 So.2d 523 (1975)

Barney Edward WELCH
v.
ROBERT CAMPBELL, INC. and Southern Casualty Ins. Co.

No. 56903.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 22, 1975.

Denied. No error of law in the ruling of the Court of Appeal.

TATE, J., I respectfully dissent. A grave injustice through legal technicality has been caused this admittedly totally disabled employee. By the defendants' interrogatories Campbell's status as statutory employee was admitted. Although the trial court may have been in error in considering these interrogatories, since technically not admitted in evidence although filed as part of the court record prior to trial, remand should have been ordered rather than denying this admittedly disabled employee workmen's compensation to which he is clearly entitled. See Wade v. Calcasieu Paper Co., 229 La. 702, 86 So.2d 540 (1956), and many other decisions requiring this result in view of the paternalistic purposes of the compensation statute, including its provision that technical rules of evidence are relaxed. La.R.S. 23:1317.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion the court of appeal disposition of this case was clearly erroneous; the case should have been remanded to the district court.

CALOGERO, J., is of the opinion this writ should have been granted. Plaintiff's judgment for permanent and total workmen's compensation benefits awarded by a trial judge who obviously considered defendant's answer to interrogatories admitting the requisite statutory employer-employee relationship, has been taken away for the hypertechnical and in my view unsound legal reason that the interrogatories and answer filed in the trial court record before trial were not formally introduced in evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.
365 So. 2d 586 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)
State v. Pierce
321 So. 2d 523 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
321 So. 2d 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-robert-campbell-inc-la-1975.