Welch v. North Eastern Railroad

46 S.C.L. 290
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 15, 1859
StatusPublished

This text of 46 S.C.L. 290 (Welch v. North Eastern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welch v. North Eastern Railroad, 46 S.C.L. 290 (S.C. Ct. App. 1859).

Opinion

Curia, per O’Neall, J.

In this case we do not think that the counsel fee — fifteen dollars — was properly allowed as part of the plaintiff’s damage. Such an item has never been allowed in this State.

It cannot be said to be a necessary result of the act done by, or negligence of the defendant. If this had been a case in which vindictive damages could be given, and the jury had found a sum in gross beyond the value of the article lost, then indeed their vérdict would not have been disturbed. But in this case there is nothing which calls for such a verdict. The jury having found specifically fifteen dollars for the counsel fee, their verdict must be reformed so as to exclude that.

It is therefore ordered that a new trial be granted, unless the plaintiff shall, within thirty days from notice of this order, enter upon the record before the Clerk of Williams-burg District, a remittitur of fifteen dollars.

■ Wardlaw, Withers, Whitner, Glover, and Munbo, JJ., concurred.

New Trial, Nisi.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 S.C.L. 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-north-eastern-railroad-scctapp-1859.