Welch v. Merrill
This text of 76 Mass. 91 (Welch v. Merrill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The testimony of one of the plaintiffs as to the direction given to his servant to refuse a further credit to the person to whom the meat was furnished was incompetent. It [92]*92was res inter alios, and had no legitimate bearing on the issue before the jury. The question was not as to the direction given by the plaintiff to his servant concerning the credit, but to whom was the credit actually given. A similar point was raised in Nutting v. Page, 4 Gray, 584, and it was there held that such evidence was inadmissible.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 Mass. 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-merrill-mass-1857.