Welch v. Matthews
98 Mass. 131
Opinion
The fair construction of the contract declared on required a deed to be tendered by the landowners. The first deed was tendered by the plaintiff January 5, 1854, when he had no title, and was therefore insufficient. The second deed tendered was quite too late, the plaintiff having no title till 1858, — a delay so great that it would be impossible to hold that the defendant then continued to be bound by his contract.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Welch v. Matthews, 98 Mass. 131 (Mass. 1867).
98 Mass. 131 (Welch v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flynn v. Wallace
270 N.E.2d 919 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1971)
Marston v. Boston Publishing Co.
171 N.E. 466 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1930)
Peatland Realty Co. v. Edwards
138 P. 357 (California Court of Appeal, 1913)
Fort Payne Coal & Iron Co. v. Webster
39 N.E. 786 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Byers v. Denver Circle R.
13 Colo. 552 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1889)