Welch v. . Kinsland

93 N.C. 281
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 5, 1885·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

MerkimoN, J.

(after stating the facts). The action has not been determined npon its merits. The judgment appealed from is not a final, but an interlocutory one, that in no aspect of it, can put an end to the action, nor can it have the effect to deprive the appellant of a substantial right that he may lose, if the same shall not be reviewed at once and before final judgment; he can have the benefit of his exception, specified in the record, upon appeal from the final judgment, as well as at the present stage of the action. It may turn out that the plaintiff may be able to assert, his alleged right successfully, notwithstanding the interlocutory judgment complained of.

The appeal was improvideutly taken. It is settled by many authorities, that an appeal does not lie from such judgment. Arrington v. Arrington, 91 N. C., 301, aud the cases there cited. Hicks v. Gooch, ante, 112.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Welch v. . Kinsland, 93 N.C. 281 (N.C. 1885).

93 N.C. 281 (Welch v. . Kinsland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ford v. Mann
690 S.E.2d 281 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc.
362 S.E.2d 812 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1987)
Veazey v. City of Durham
57 S.E.2d 377 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Brown & Co. v. Nimocks
36 S.E. 278 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1900)
Emry v. . Parker
16 S.E. 236 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)
Sinclair v. Western North Carolina Railroad
16 S.E. 336 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)
Blackwell v. . McCaine
11 S.E. 360 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1890)