Welch v. Holmes

1 Tex. L. R. 510
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1882
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tex. L. R. 510 (Welch v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welch v. Holmes, 1 Tex. L. R. 510 (Tex. 1882).

Opinion

Delaney, J.-

Opinion by Our opinion is that there is no error in the judgment of the court below. A judgment by default admits every material allegation in the petition, except the amount of the damages. This has been decided so often as to render the citation of cases unñeuess?mr~ ~~

' A large number of these cases have arisen out of demands for money, in some form or other, as upon notes, accounts, etc. The case of Clark v. Compton, 15 Texas, 32, was an action of trespass. The court held that the judgment by default established the plaintiff’s right to recover, and fixed the defendant’s liability. The only province of the jury was to fix the amount. In the present case also the judgment establishes the plaintiff’s right to the land, and she could waive the damages.

This is in accordance with the Revised Statutes, art. 4803. So far as the title is concerned, a jury could have been of no service, for [512]*512-there was nothing to be established by a verdict, and there was no need of evidence, for everything had been admitted.

We think that the judgment below should be affirmed.

Report of Commissioners of Appeals examined, their opinion adopted and judgment affirmed.

Gould, C. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Compton
15 Tex. 32 (Texas Supreme Court, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Tex. L. R. 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-holmes-tex-1882.