Welch v. Douglas-Welch

800 So. 2d 630, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14485, 2001 WL 1202770
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-4910
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 800 So. 2d 630 (Welch v. Douglas-Welch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welch v. Douglas-Welch, 800 So. 2d 630, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14485, 2001 WL 1202770 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

WHATLEY, Acting Chief Judge.

Benjamin Welch appeals the final judgment of dissolution of his marriage to Anna Welch. He raises several issues in this appeal, but we find merit only in his argument regarding the trial court’s disposition of the parties’ joint savings account.

In the order granting Anna’s motion for temporary alimony, the trial court found that at the time of separation, Anna removed the $32,000 in the parties’ joint savings account and placed that amount in a separate account. The court further found that, as of the date of the hearing on Anna’s motion for temporary alimony, Anna had used all but $9000 of the parties’ joint savings. The trial court’s only reference to the parties’ joint savings account in the final judgment of dissolution is the incorporation of these findings from the order granting temporary alimony into that judgment and a finding that all bank accounts had already been divided between the parties.

Benjamin contends that he has not been given credit for Anna’s use of his share of the parties’ joint savings account. He requests that his obligation to pay Anna retroactive temporary alimony be offset by Anna’s use of his share of the parties’ savings.

The final judgment of dissolution is not clear with regard to the disposition of the parties’ joint savings account. See § 61.075(3), Fla. Stat. (2000). Accordingly, we remand the judgment for findings regarding the disposition of this marital asset, as well as consideration of whether the record supports any type of credit to Benjamin for Anna’s use of his share of the parties’ joint savings account.

Remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

NORTHCUTT, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valentine v. Van Sickle
42 So. 3d 267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Buoniconti v. Buoniconti
36 So. 3d 154 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
800 So. 2d 630, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14485, 2001 WL 1202770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-douglas-welch-fladistctapp-2001.