Welch v. Chambers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Welch v. Chambers

281 A.D. 1054, 121 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4305

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 13, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D. 1054 (Welch v. Chambers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Welch v. Chambers, 281 A.D. 1054, 121 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Otsego County, entered in the clerk’s office on Juno 13, 1952. The parties are cattle dealers each having long and involved open-account proceedings with a dairyman and both relying on cumulative collateral security. They narrowed their controversy down to five head of cattle. The court awarded two to plaintiffs and three to defendant. Plaintiffs, claiming all five, appeal. The court made a pragmatic and an equitable disposition of the respective claims of liens. The argument on appeal does not demonstrate clearly enough to our satisfaction that the Trial Term was wrong in its view of the complex course of transactions. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Otsego County, entered in the clerk’s office on Juno 13, 1952. The parties are cattle dealers each having long and involved open-account proceedings with a dairyman and both relying on cumulative collateral security. They narrowed their controversy down to five head of cattle. The court awarded two to plaintiffs and three to defendant. Plaintiffs, claiming all five, appeal. The court made a pragmatic and an equitable disposition of the respective claims of liens. The argument on appeal does not demonstrate clearly enough to our satisfaction that the Trial Term was wrong in its view of the complex course of transactions. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 1054, 121 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welch-v-chambers-nyappdiv-1953.