Welch v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
72 N.E. 500, 187 Mass. 118, 1904 Mass. LEXIS 1097
Opinion
The testimony of the plaintiff and her daughter furnished no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant. It is at least very questionable whether there was any evidence that the plaintiff was in the exercise of due care.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Welch v. Boston Elevated Railway Co., 72 N.E. 500, 187 Mass. 118, 1904 Mass. LEXIS 1097 (Mass. 1904).
72 N.E. 500 (Welch v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Knych v. Trustees of New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
69 N.E.2d 575 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1946)
Conway v. Salt Lake & O. Ry. Co.
155 P. 339 (Utah Supreme Court, 1916)
Hogan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
81 N.E. 198 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Hawes v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
78 N.E. 480 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Hilborn v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.
77 N.E. 646 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Willworth v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
74 N.E. 333 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Falkins v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
74 N.E. 338 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)