Welborn v. State

103 S.E. 193, 25 Ga. App. 245, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 712
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1920·No. 11280·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Bloodwoeth, J.

The facts in this case are not sufficient to support a conviction of burglary, and the judge erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Colley & Colley, Hugh E. Combs, for plaintiff in error,

cited: Penal Code (1910), § 1017; Butter v. State, 17 Ga. App. 522, and citations.

R. C. Norman, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Welborn v. State, 103 S.E. 193, 25 Ga. App. 245, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 712 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

103 S.E. 193 (Welborn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maddox v. State
221 S.E.2d 231 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Nooner v. State
206 S.E.2d 660 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Ervin v. State
195 S.E.2d 782 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
McPherson v. State
101 S.E.2d 750 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Parker v. State
71 S.E.2d 765 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)