WeKnow Technologies, Inc. v. Jerry Hyman
This text of WeKnow Technologies, Inc. v. Jerry Hyman (WeKnow Technologies, Inc. v. Jerry Hyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-12-00382-CV
|
WeKnow Technologies, Inc. |
APPELLANT |
|
|
V. |
||
|
Jerry Hyman |
APPELLEE |
|
------------
FROM THE 355th District Court OF Hood COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
On January 17, 2013, we notified appellant that its brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: February 28, 2013
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
WeKnow Technologies, Inc. v. Jerry Hyman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weknow-technologies-inc-v-jerry-hyman-texapp-2013.