Weitzenblum v. Richmond Light & Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Weitzenblum v. Richmond Light & Railroad

179 A.D. 918

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 179 A.D. 918 (Weitzenblum v. Richmond Light & Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Weitzenblum v. Richmond Light & Railroad, 179 A.D. 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Upon the ground that the verdict was against the evidence, the judgment and order are reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The findings of the jury that the defendant’s conductor in his altercation with the plaintiff was acting within the scope of his authority, and that the plaintiff was then a passenger, are reversed. Present — Scott, Dowling, Smith, Page and Shearn, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Upon the ground that the verdict was against the evidence, the judgment and order are reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The findings of the jury that the defendant’s conductor in his altercation with the plaintiff was acting within the scope of his authority, and that the plaintiff was then a passenger, are reversed. Present — Scott, Dowling, Smith, Page and Shearn, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 A.D. 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weitzenblum-v-richmond-light-railroad-nyappdiv-1917.